+Secure | Application Security

Application Penetration Testing

Web Apps — APIs — Mobile — Source Code

Every application your organisation exposes to users, partners, or the internet is an attack surface. Automated scanners flag the obvious. Our testers find the vulnerabilities that matter — the business logic flaws, chained exploits, and authentication bypasses that lead to actual breaches.

CREST Accredited
OSCP Certified
OWASP Top 10 : 2025
OWASP API Top 10
Attack Surface Coverage

What We Test

We test applications the way a real attacker targets them — not through a predefined checklist, but by understanding your application's logic, architecture, and data flows, then systematically exploiting them.

01
Most Requested

Web Application Penetration Testing

Full manual assessment of your web applications — from authentication and session management to business logic and data handling. We go far beyond automated DAST scanning to test what matters: can an attacker escalate privileges, access other users' data, or manipulate business workflows?

Authentication Bypass IDOR SQL Injection XSS CSRF SSRF File Upload Business Logic
02
Fastest Growing

API Penetration Testing

REST, GraphQL, SOAP, and WebSocket APIs tested against the OWASP API Security Top 10. We map your API surface, test every endpoint, and exploit authorisation logic that scanners cannot detect — including BOLA, mass assignment, and business flow abuse.

BOLA BFLA Mass Assignment Rate Limiting JWT Attacks GraphQL Introspection API Versioning
03
Android & iOS

Mobile Application Penetration Testing

Client-side and server-side assessment of your mobile apps. We decompile, reverse-engineer, and test against the OWASP Mobile Top 10 — covering insecure data storage, weak cryptography, certificate pinning bypass, and API communication flaws.

Data Storage Certificate Pinning Root/Jailbreak Detection Binary Analysis API Comms Keychain/Keystore
04
Shift Left

Source Code Review

Manual code review by security engineers — not just an automated SAST tool run. We trace data flows through your codebase to find injection points, hardcoded secrets, insecure deserialization, and logic flaws that only human reviewers can identify.

Input Validation Auth Logic Cryptographic Usage Error Handling Dependency Audit Hardcoded Secrets
Testing Framework

Aligned to OWASP Top 10 : 2025

The OWASP Top 10 was updated in 2025 — the first revision since 2021, analysing 589 CWEs across 175,000+ CVE records. Our testing methodology maps directly to these categories, ensuring your applications are assessed against the most current risk landscape.

A01

Broken Access Control

IDOR, privilege escalation, CORS misconfiguration. SSRF now consolidated here.

A02

Security Misconfiguration

Moved from #5 to #2. Default credentials, exposed panels, verbose errors.

A03 New

Supply Chain Failures

Compromised dependencies, build pipeline attacks, third-party component risks.

A04

Cryptographic Failures

Weak algorithms, poor key management, missing TLS enforcement.

A05

Injection

SQL, XSS, command injection — still the largest number of CVEs across all categories.

A06

Insecure Design

Architecture-level flaws. Threat modelling gaps, missing security controls by design.

A07

Authentication Failures

Credential stuffing, weak MFA, session fixation, token mismanagement.

A08

Data Integrity Failures

Insecure deserialization, CI/CD pipeline integrity, unsigned updates.

A09

Logging & Alerting Failures

Insufficient monitoring that delays breach detection and forensic response.

A10 New

Exceptional Conditions

Improper error handling, failing open, logic errors under abnormal conditions.

Our assessments use the OWASP Top 10 as a baseline — not a ceiling. We test beyond the Top 10 to cover business-specific risks unique to your application.

Know the Difference

Automated Scanner ≠ Penetration Test

Running a DAST or SAST tool against your application is not a penetration test. If your last "pentest" was a scanner-generated PDF with no proof-of-concept exploits, you have not been penetration tested.

Automated Scanner

Flags known CVE patterns from a signature database
Cannot test business logic or workflow abuse
High false-positive rate — findings require manual triage
No exploit validation or proof-of-concept
Misses chained attack paths across multiple endpoints
Cannot test authentication or authorisation logic
Output: vulnerability list sorted by CVSS
VS

Manual Penetration Test

Exploits real vulnerabilities with proof-of-concept evidence
Tests business logic, workflow abuse, and race conditions
Every finding is validated and demonstrated — zero false positives
Chains vulnerabilities to show real-world impact
Tests authorisation at every role, endpoint, and state transition
Discovers zero-day and application-specific logic flaws
Output: attack narrative with business risk context
How We Work

Our 5-Phase Assessment Methodology

We combine automated reconnaissance with deep manual exploitation. Every finding is validated by hand. Every report is actionable.

01

Scoping & Reconnaissance

Map the application surface, define testing boundaries, identify technologies, and enumerate all endpoints, roles, and data flows.

02

Automated Discovery

Deploy industry-standard scanning tools to establish a vulnerability baseline. This surfaces the known issues — the starting point, not the finish line.

03

Manual Exploitation

Our OSCP-certified testers manually probe authentication logic, authorisation boundaries, business workflows, and input handling — finding what scanners miss.

04

Reporting & Debrief

Detailed findings with proof-of-concept evidence, severity ratings, and remediation guidance tailored to your development stack. Executive summary included.

05

Remediation Retest

After your team fixes the findings, we retest to confirm vulnerabilities are properly closed — not just patched on the surface.

The AKATI Advantage

Why Organisations Choose AKATI Sekurity

CREST & OSCP Certified

Our testers hold industry-recognised offensive security certifications. CREST accreditation means our methodology is independently audited.

Manual-First Approach

We use scanners for baseline coverage. Every critical and high finding is discovered, validated, and exploited manually by a human tester.

Actionable Reports

Every finding includes proof-of-concept evidence, risk context for your business, and remediation steps your developers can act on immediately.

Remediation Retest

We do not just report and walk away. After remediation, we retest every finding to confirm the fix is effective — included in every engagement.

Get Started

Secure Your Applications Before Attackers Do

Tell us what you need tested — web application, API, mobile app, or source code — and we will scope an assessment tailored to your application architecture, compliance requirements, and risk profile.