Why Your Cyber Insurance Claim Will Be Denied.

Oct 29

Written By: AKATI Sekurity Insights Team | Cybersecurity Consulting & MSSP Experts

Reading Time: 8 minutes

Key Takeaway: Cyber insurance claims are increasingly denied or reduced due to policy exclusions, failure to maintain required security controls, and insufficient incident documentation. Organizations investing millions in premiums often discover coverage gaps during the crisis itself. This guide reveals six critical steps to ensure your cyber insurance actually pays when disaster strikes—before you're fighting a claim denial while managing a ransomware attack.

When the Safety Net Has Holes: The Claim That Should Have Been Covered

Picture this:

It's 3 AM when your phone rings. Ransomware has encrypted your production environment. Customer data is locked. Operations are dead in the water. The attackers want $2.5 million, and they're threatening to leak everything if you don't pay within 72 hours. Your CFO's first question: "We have cyber insurance, right?" You do. Ten million in coverage. You've been paying $180,000 annually for three years. Everyone breathes slightly easier knowing the financial burden isn't entirely yours. Fast forward three months. Your insurer has denied 70% of the claim. They're paying $750,000 of the $3.2 million in total losses. Why? Because during their investigation, they discovered your team disabled multi-factor authentication on administrator accounts six months ago to streamline a system upgrade. That MFA requirement was explicitly listed in your policy as a condition of coverage. Now you're explaining to your board why the company is paying $2.5 million out of pocket for an incident you thought was insured.

This scenario plays out more often than anyone wants to admit. Cyber insurance has become a standard checkbox in enterprise risk management, but too many organizations treat it like car insurance—pay the premium, file a claim if something bad happens, and assume everything's covered. Except cyber insurance doesn't work that way. These policies contain pages of security control requirements, exclusion clauses, documentation mandates, and incident response protocols that most organizations never read until they're in the middle of a claim dispute. The difference between full coverage and a denied claim often comes down to details that seem trivial until they cost you millions. Here's what you need to know before you need to file a claim.

Step 1: Read Your Policy Like Your Job Depends On It (Because It Might)

Let's be honest—nobody reads insurance policies for fun. They're dense, filled with legal language, and buried somewhere in your shared drive. But here's the thing: your cyber insurance policy is essentially a contract that says "we'll pay for incidents if you maintain these specific security controls." The controls aren't suggestions. They're requirements. Break them, and the insurer can walk away from the claim.

Most policies now require multi-factor authentication on all remote access and privileged accounts. Not "recommended." Required. If you have a single domain administrator account without MFA, and that's the account attackers compromise, your claim faces immediate scrutiny. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has become table stakes—insurers want to see active monitoring on every workstation and server. Installing the software isn't enough; you need to demonstrate someone actually reviews and responds to alerts. Offline or immutable backups tested quarterly. Network segmentation. Documented incident response plans tested annually. Patching critical vulnerabilities within 30 days.

The kicker? Insurers verify these requirements twice. Once before issuing coverage, and again when you file a claim. That security questionnaire you rushed through during policy application? The insurer keeps it. When you file a claim, they'll send forensic investigators to compare what you promised to what was actually in place. Any discrepancies become ammunition for claim reduction or denial. Organizations need to treat these requirements like regulatory compliance—create a checklist, assign ownership, and verify quarterly that everything's still in place. Because the time to discover you're not compliant isn't during a claim investigation.

Step 2: Build Documentation Like Your Insurer Is Already Investigating

Here's what happens during a cyber insurance claim investigation: Forensic analysts dig through your systems looking for evidence. Not evidence of the attack—evidence that you maintained the security controls you promised. They want timestamped logs proving MFA was enforced on the compromised account. EDR records showing the infected endpoint was protected and alerts were reviewed. Backup logs demonstrating data was backed up according to schedule and successfully restored during testing. Patch management reports proving that exploited vulnerability wasn't sitting unpatched past your policy's timeline. Training records showing the employee who clicked the phishing link completed security awareness training.

Most organizations can't produce this documentation. They know they have MFA deployed. They're pretty sure backups are running. Someone probably tested restoration at some point. But "pretty sure" doesn't win insurance claims. Insurers need dated evidence from systems, not assurances from IT managers. The solution isn't creating documentation after an incident (which looks suspicious and won't work anyway). It's building documentation automatically as part of normal operations. Configure your MFA system to generate monthly compliance reports showing enforcement status. Set your EDR platform to create weekly summaries of endpoint coverage and alert response times. Schedule automated backup testing quarterly and save the results. Export patch management reports monthly showing vulnerability remediation timelines. Keep training completion records with dates and scores.

Think of it this way: you're building a paper trail that proves compliance long before any incident occurs. When the insurer's investigators arrive, you hand them a folder of reports spanning the past two years showing continuous compliance with policy requirements. That's how you win claims. The organizations that fight payment disputes for months are the ones scrambling to reconstruct documentation after the fact, trying to remember whether MFA was enabled on the compromised account six months ago. Don't be that organization.

Step 3: Understand What's Actually Excluded Before You Need It

Every cyber insurance policy contains pages of exclusions—scenarios where coverage doesn't apply despite premiums being paid. Some exclusions are obvious: intentional acts by employees, prior known incidents, or war and terrorism. Others catch organizations off guard during claims. Many policies exclude losses from unpatched vulnerabilities that were publicly disclosed more than 30 days before the incident. Translation: if attackers exploit a vulnerability that's been public for 45 days, and you haven't patched it, the insurer may deny coverage for that incident. This exclusion exists in many policies but surprises organizations who thought all ransomware was covered regardless of the entry vector.

Social engineering fraud represents another common exclusion that trips up organizations. Your policy might cover ransomware attacks but exclude losses from business email compromise (BEC) where employees are tricked into wiring money to attackers. These are considered fraud rather than hacking, placing them outside traditional cyber coverage. Some policies require separate social engineering coverage endorsements. Nation-state attacks and acts of war present growing exclusion concerns. When ransomware groups have suspected ties to nation-state actors, insurers sometimes invoke war exclusions to deny claims. The NotPetya attack in 2017 led to multiple high-profile coverage disputes where insurers argued the Russia-linked attack constituted an act of war excluded from policies.

You need to know your policy's exclusions before purchasing coverage, not after filing a claim. During policy review, ask specific questions: Are all ransomware incidents covered regardless of entry point? What happens if we're compromised through an unpatched vulnerability—is there a timeframe requirement? Does social engineering fraud require separate coverage? How does the policy handle nation-state attributed attacks? Are there sublimits on specific types of losses like business interruption or data restoration? Getting these answers upfront allows you to either negotiate better terms, purchase additional endorsements to close gaps, or at least understand your actual risk exposure. The worst time to discover exclusions is when you're already managing a crisis.

Step 4: Follow Your Policy's Incident Response Requirements to the Letter

Most organizations have incident response plans. What they often don't realize is that their cyber insurance policy contains its own incident response requirements that override internal procedures. Policies typically require notification to the insurer within specific timeframes—often 24 to 72 hours of discovering an incident. Miss this deadline, and the insurer can deny coverage for late reporting. Some policies require pre-approval before taking certain actions. Want to pay a ransom? Many policies require explicit insurer consent before payment. They often have negotiation teams experienced in dealing with ransomware groups who can potentially reduce demands. Organizations that pay ransoms without insurer involvement sometimes discover the payment isn't covered.

Insurers frequently require you to use their panel of approved vendors for incident response, forensics, and legal services. Using your existing relationships with outside firms may not be covered, or may be reimbursed at lower rates. This creates awkward situations during incidents where your team wants to engage trusted partners, but policy compliance requires using insurer-selected vendors you've never worked with. The solution is understanding these requirements before incidents occur. Review your policy's incident response section carefully. What's the notification timeline? Who must be notified (often both your insurance broker and the carrier's claims team)? Are there actions requiring pre-approval? Does the policy require specific vendors, or can you use your preferred partners with prior approval? Can you pre-approve your existing incident response retainer with the insurer?

Some organizations negotiate better terms during policy purchase, getting their preferred vendors pre-approved as acceptable under the policy. Others ensure their internal incident response procedures explicitly reference insurance notification requirements, making compliance automatic. The key is integration—your incident response plan should include cyber insurance notification as a documented step, with contact information readily available. During a crisis, you don't want responders hunting through shared drives trying to find the insurer's emergency claims number while the clock ticks on notification deadlines.

Step 5: Maintain Security Controls Through Organizational Change

Here's a scenario that derails coverage: Your organization implements all required security controls to obtain cyber insurance. Multi-factor authentication everywhere. EDR deployed across all endpoints. Segmented networks. Everything's documented and verified. Policy bound. Eighteen months later, your company acquires a smaller firm. The acquisition brings 200 new users, 150 new workstations, and several new servers. Integration happens quickly—accounts are created, systems are connected to the network, resources are accessed. What doesn't happen? Applying the same security controls to acquired infrastructure. The new systems don't have EDR. New user accounts don't require MFA. Acquired servers aren't included in your backup rotation or patching schedule.

Six months after acquisition, ransomware enters through a compromised account from the acquired company, spreads across the now-connected networks, and encrypts everything. During the claim investigation, your insurer discovers that 40% of your environment—the acquired portion—wasn't meeting policy requirements for EDR, MFA, and backups. They reduce the claim proportionally, arguing that your failure to maintain required controls across the entire organization contributed to the loss. Organizational changes create security control gaps. Mergers and acquisitions bring new infrastructure. Cloud migrations move workloads to new environments. Remote work initiatives create new access patterns. Major software implementations change system architectures. Each change presents opportunities for security controls to lapse or fail to extend to new systems.

The solution requires treating cyber insurance requirements like regulatory compliance that follows organizational changes. When acquiring a company, your due diligence checklist should include verifying acquired systems meet your insurance policy requirements, or planning remediation before integration. When migrating to cloud platforms, ensure security controls deploy to cloud resources with the same rigor as on-premises systems. When launching new products or services, verify that supporting infrastructure receives the same EDR, MFA, backup, and monitoring coverage as existing systems. Assign someone—often your CISO or risk management team—explicit responsibility for maintaining insurance control compliance through organizational change. They don't need to implement controls directly, but they need authority to flag gaps and halt changes that would create compliance issues with insurance requirements.

Step 6: Test Your Coverage With Tabletop Exercises Before Real Incidents

Most organizations never discover gaps in their cyber insurance coverage until they're filing claims. By then it's too late to fix problems. The alternative is testing coverage proactively through tabletop exercises that simulate incidents and walk through the claim process. These exercises reveal misunderstandings, documentation gaps, and policy interpretation issues before money's on the line. A well-designed cyber insurance tabletop involves key stakeholders: IT and security teams, legal counsel, risk management, your insurance broker, finance/CFO, and ideally a representative from your insurance carrier.

Walk through realistic scenarios: ransomware encrypts production systems with attackers demanding payment, business email compromise results in fraudulent wire transfers, data breach exposes customer personally identifiable information requiring notification. For each scenario, ask critical questions: Who notifies the insurance carrier and within what timeframe? What documentation do we need to provide immediately versus during investigation? Which vendors can we engage—our preferred partners or insurer-required firms? What actions require pre-approval from the insurer? What portions of our losses are actually covered versus excluded? Can we demonstrate we maintained all required security controls? These exercises expose gaps. You might discover nobody knows the insurer's emergency claims contact information. Documentation you assumed existed doesn't. Key personnel don't understand notification timelines. Required security controls aren't actually deployed everywhere.

The best part? You can fix these problems immediately. Update your incident response procedures with insurer notification steps. Build the documentation systems discussed earlier. Deploy missing controls. Negotiate with your insurer to pre-approve vendors or adjust requirements. Organizations that conduct these exercises annually, then remediate discovered gaps, position themselves for smooth claims processes during actual incidents. It's the difference between scrambling during a crisis versus executing a well-rehearsed plan. Your insurer will often participate in these exercises—most prefer to identify problems proactively rather than during claims disputes. It demonstrates your commitment to risk management and often strengthens the insurer-client relationship, which matters when you eventually need their help during a real incident.

How AKATI Sekurity Helps Organizations Bridge the Gap Between Security and Insurance

Cyber insurance requirements increasingly align with security best practices, but many organizations struggle to implement and document controls that satisfy both insurers and their own risk management needs. That's where specialized cybersecurity expertise becomes critical. AKATI Sekurity's Cybersecurity Consulting services help organizations understand their cyber insurance policy requirements, then design security architectures that maintain compliance while supporting business operations. We review policies to identify specific control requirements, exclusions, and documentation needs—then build roadmaps to achieve and maintain compliance. Our Security Posture Assessments evaluate current security controls against both insurance requirements and industry frameworks like NIST Cybersecurity Framework, providing gap analysis and remediation priorities.

Through our 24/7 Managed Security Services (MSSP), we provide continuous monitoring, threat detection, and incident response that generates the documentation insurers require during claims—EDR logs, alert response records, security event timelines, and compliance reports. Our services create an automatic audit trail demonstrating security control maintenance over time. When incidents occur, our Incident Response Retainer provides immediate expert support while ensuring compliance with insurance policy notification and response requirements. We coordinate with insurers, legal counsel, and approved vendors to manage incidents according to policy terms—protecting both your operations and your coverage. Our Penetration Testing services validate security controls meet real-world threat standards, providing evidence for insurers that required protections actually work. Testing results help during policy applications and renewals, often securing better coverage terms or lower premiums.

For ASEAN organizations, we understand regional regulations like Bank Negara Malaysia RMiT, Monetary Authority of Singapore TRM Guidelines, and Personal Data Protection Act requirements that often overlap with insurance mandates. For US organizations, we align security programs with HIPAA, PCI DSS, and CMMC requirements alongside insurance obligations. Whether you're purchasing your first cyber insurance policy, facing renewal with new requirements, or want to ensure your current coverage will actually pay during incidents, AKATI Sekurity provides the expertise to bridge security operations and insurance compliance.

Ready to ensure your cyber insurance investment actually protects you when it matters? Contact AKATI Sekurity at hello@akati.com for more information.

About the Author: This article was developed by AKATI Sekurity's risk management and cybersecurity consulting teams with experience helping organizations across financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, and technology sectors align security programs with cyber insurance requirements in ASEAN and North America.

Cyber InsuranceMulti-Factor Authentication